Skip to content
Read • Question • ConnectAnthony’s notes & researchReturn with a new question
Anthony’s NotesA personal field guide
From the notebook

The Great Debate Israel v Palestine Candace Ep 10

  • Idea that there’s no disconfirming evidence.
    • If someone agrees = good
    • If someone disagrees = proof of confirmed opposition, conspiracy etc..

DAVE

  • Palestinians kicked off their land and then occupied by Israel
    • Likud founded by Menachem Begin, an actual terrorist
    • Violently evicted from their place they were living hundreds/thousands of years
    • Natural rights, doesn’t matter if it was a state
  • 1947: UN Partition Plan
    • Only a recommendation, didn’t have authority
    • Zionist settlers violently enforce that
    • Israel: 54% in Plan, took 78% after 48 war, after 67 took 100%
  • Last 22% is the only thing the peace process is about, its not about the river to the see,
    • P. only want that 22% is what he’s claiming
    • Israel has no claim to that 22%
  • Gaza disengagement
  • Israel is exploiting the asymmetrical war
  • Netanyahu was propping up Hamas
  • Israel fault because they wanted to start a homeland in somebody elses homeland
    • Bunch of Eastern Europeans
    • Didn’t know the place at all
    • Didn’t speak Arabic
  • Dave keeps saying “started with a bunch of P. getting kicked out of their land”
  • Dave admits you can’t kick Israelis out of their land now
  • P. should have full natural rights protection
  • Israel won; P. should get the 22%
  • I think its not if Israeli’s agreed with Dave’s idea of just getting 22%, its that the Palestinians themselves that don’t want 22% but 100% which is to say, Israel is destroyed

Ami

  • Thomas Sowell “Compared to what?”
    • Leadership of Hamas and Palestinians have said much worse things compared to Israel
    • P. citizens cheering seeing Israel citizens dragged through the street