Book Cover

DESCRIPTION

INSTANT #1 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER The eight-time #1 New York Times bestselling author, radio host, and Fox News star returns to the page to reveal the radically dangerous Democrat agenda that is upending American life. In American Marxism, Mark Levin explained how Marxist ideology has invaded our society and culture. In doing so, he exposed the institutions, scholars, and activists leading the revolution. Now, he picks up where he left off: to hold responsible the true malefactors steering our country down the wrong path. Insightful and hard-hitting as ever, Levin proves that since its establishment, the Democrat Party has set out to rewrite history and destroy the foundation of freedom in America. More than a political party, it is the entity through which Marxism has installed its philosophy and its new revolution. As in a Thomas Paine pamphlet or a clarion call from Paul Revere, Levin alerts his fellow Americans to the destruction this country is facing, and rallies them to defeat the threat in front of us—more looming than ever. He writes, “Every legal, legitimate, and appropriate tool and method must be employed in the short- and long- run to defeat the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party must be resoundingly conquered in the next election and several elections thereafter, or it will become extremely difficult to undo the damage it is unleashing at breakneck pace.”

Chapter One: The Democrat Party & Authoritarianism

Discussion of party structure in America and Western countries emphasizing the legality of opposition and peaceful rivalry.
The administrative state’s role in implementing Democrat Party’s ideological purposes.
Efforts to alter cultural and societal aspects including adding Democrat senators, controlling the Supreme Court, and changing voting processes.
The goal of dominating executive and legislative branches, media, judiciary, and economy.
Mention of George Soros, Critical Race Theory (CRT), and Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) investing.
The 1619 Project, and attempts to change public perception of American history.
Mention of the New York Times’ past political stances and the “For the People Act of 2021” (H.R. 1).
Efforts to eliminate the Electoral College and pack the Senate and Supreme Court.

Chapter Two: Anti-Black Racism & Anti-Semitism

The association between progressivism and eugenics.
Influence of eugenics advocates like Margaret Sanger and their impact on American society.
Actions of Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt in reinforcing racist policies and segregation.
Roosevelt’s role in WWII, including inaction during the Holocaust and internment of Japanese Americans.
Lyndon Johnson and Joe Biden’s historical stances on racial issues.
The relationship between early progressives and Soviet Russia.

Chapter Three: Anti-White Racism & Anti-Semitism

Linking of class struggles and race by American Marxists.
Debates over the relationship between capitalism, slavery, and racism.
The role of civil rights Marxism in contemporary politics.
Discussions on color-blind racism and its implications.
The impact of policies and ideologies on racial relations and perceptions in the U.S.

Chapter Four: Language Control & Thought Control

The use of language and thought control techniques by totalitarian regimes.
The role of media and educational institutions in shaping public perception and language.
Discussions on political correctness and its impact on society and culture.

Chapter Five: War on the American Citizen

The role of citizenship in uniting people around common values and principles.
The Biden administration’s immigration policies and their impact.
Discussions on the assimilation of immigrants into American society and culture.
The influence of Democrat Party agendas on school systems and education.

Chapter Six: War on the Nuclear Family

Karl Marx’s views on the abolition of the bourgeois family.
The decrease in married-couple households in the U.S. since 1950.
Biden administration’s endorsement of gender-reassignment surgery and hormone treatments for minors.
Discussions on the unreliability of studies supporting medical interventions for transgender care.
Policies in public schools regarding gender identity and parental knowledge.
Disney’s initiative for increased LGBTQ and racial minority representation in productions.
Dr. Debra Soh’s critique of biased information in gender and biological sex research.
The influence of Critical Race Theory in education and medicine.
The relationship between crime rates and Democrat-led cities, with a focus on Soros-backed prosecutors.
Concerns about the welfare state penalizing marriage, and the success sequence for economic stability.
Milton Friedman’s views on inflation and government spending.
Discussion of the Democrat Party’s shift away from the working middle class.
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink’s advocacy for Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) in corporations.

Chapter Seven: War on the Constitution

Assertions of the Constitution’s support for white supremacy.
Critiques of the Constitution by academics and activists.
Historical context regarding the Constitution, slavery, and the Founders’ views.
Analysis of the three-fifths clause and its implications.
Discussion on the separation of powers and the First Amendment.
The Biden administration’s expansion of efforts to control speech.
Issues concerning freedom of the press and religious liberty under Democrat policies.
Historical examples of government overreach in free speech and press.

Chapter Eight: Stalin Would Be Proud

Critique of the Democrat Party’s approach to politics, likening it to totalitarian regimes.
Analysis of the Democrat Party’s influence on various sectors, including bureaucracy, judiciary, and media.

Epilogue

Summary of the Democrat Party’s strategy in maintaining power and control over government and cultural institutions.
The increasing difficulty in reversing political and cultural shifts imposed by the Democrat Party.

Notebook Export

TheDemocrat_Party_HatesAmerica

Mark R. Levin

Chapter One: The Democrat Party & Authoritarianism

As the late philosopher Raymond Aron explained, the party structure in America and other Western countries is based on the “legality of opposition” (a rare phenomenon in history), a constitutionally based “peaceful rivalry,” the “legal exercise of power,” the “temporary exercise of power,” and the “legitimate method of exercising power.”
Indeed, the vast administrative state built mostly, albeit not exclusively, by the Democrat Party issues edicts, dictates, regulations, rules, fines, and penalties that serve the ideological purposes of the Democrat Party, whether the Democrat Party is in power or not. It requires the affirmative intervention of a Republican administration to roll back, stop, or fundamentally reverse the trajectory of administrative state decisions exercised on behalf of the Democrat Party.
Democrat Party seeks to eliminate the Senate filibuster rule in order to pass legislation that will fundamentally alter innumerable aspects of our culture and society; add four more Democrat senators to the Senate to prevent the Republican Party from ever winning a majority in the Senate; add justices to the Supreme Court in order to control the ideological makeup of the Court for decades to come; and change the rules, processes, and outcomes of the popular vote throughout the nation to make it impossible for the Republican Party to win the presidency and majorities in Congress. The goal is to “cripple the opposition [the GOP] without annihilating it” and empower the Democrat Party into the distant future. And, of course, the Democrat Party’s use of the Department of Justice, FBI, IRS, etc., against political opponents is the stuff of police-state autocracies.
“Central to the modern authoritarian strategy is the capture of institutions that undergird political pluralism. The goal is to dominate not only the executive and legislative branches, but also the media, the judiciary, civil society, the commanding heights of the economy, and the security forces.…”
George Soros
Critical Race Theory (CRT)
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing in private businesses to help subsidize the Democrat Party’s extreme political agenda;
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) commissars
“Twitter Files”),
purpose of American Marxism generally; the 1619 Project; the vilification of America’s founders, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution; teaching CRT and other racist ideologies; the toppling of historic monuments and statues; changing names of schools and military installations; etc., is to weaken if not destroy allegiance to our country and knowledge of its real history, especially with younger generations of Americans. Marx would be proud.
New York Times—which in the past has supported Stalin, covered up the Holocaust, and helped install Castro in Cuba—
“For the People Act of 2021” (H.R. 1), which would have destroyed the American voting system and replaced it with a collection of schemes intended to empower the Democrat Party for decades to come. Heritage states: “H.R. 1 would federalize and micromanage the election process administered by the states, imposing unnecessary, unwise, and unconstitutional mandates on the states and reversing the decentralization of the American election process—which is essential to the protection of our liberty and freedom.
Democrat Party efforts to eliminate the Electoral College, which has as its purpose to select presidents and vice presidents based solely on the popular vote.
pack the Senate with more Democrats by adding Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., as new states, producing four more Democrat senators; eliminating the Senate filibuster rule, thereby enabling a simple majority to make enduring changes to the country; and, expanding and packing the Supreme Court, thereby turning the Court and ultimately the law into a powerful ideological and political tool for enforcing Democrat Party dogma. These are the tactics and actions of a party seeing absolute power.
racial brainwashing and stereotyping in teacher training, seminars, classroom courses, textbooks, and the school libraries;
resegregating students based on race; promoting economic socialism and “environmental justice” (“ climate change” and anticapitalism); and disemboweling America’s founding, founders, Declaration of Independence, and Constitution, schools have become indoctrination mills operated by Democrat Party–affiliated teachers’ unions on behalf of the Democrat Party and the American Marxist agenda.
destroy female athletic programs (in violation of Title IX),
defy immigration statutes,
The Biden Justice Department has threatened parents who protest at school board meetings—challenging CRT, pornographic material in school libraries, drag queen shows, the sexualizing of their children, and other Democrat Party agendas taught to public school children—and used armed SWAT teams to arrest pro-life protestors at their homes for peacefully assembling at abortion clinics.
eliminating voter identification laws; eliminating signature and date requirements for absentee ballots; universal mail-in voting; automatic voter registration; preregistering voters under the age of eighteen; voter harvesting; voter drop boxes; early voting; extended voting; illegal-alien voting in local elections; the distribution of driver’s licenses to illegal aliens; etc.
Ludwig von Mises once wrote, “[ t] he ideas of Marx, and his philosophy [which] truly dominate our age. The interpretation of current events and the interpretation of history in popular books, as well as in philosophical writings, novels, plays, and so forth, are by and large Marxist.” 38
Democrat Party evolved into an anti-American political and cultural entity. That is not to say there are no Democrat Party officials and, of course, party members who are patriots. However, they are increasingly the exception to the rule. At the highest levels of the Democrat Party are individuals who are dragging our nation into their “Marxist paradise.”
party must come before country,
Americanism and Marxism are utterly incompatible. Americanism emphasizes unalienable, God-given individual rights; the right to life and liberty; natural law (that is, the existence of eternal truths and moral principles); a civil society (or social compact/ contract) where there is equal justice under a just law and law and order to secure the safety and well-being of the citizenry; religious freedom; limited government; representative government; private property rights; free speech and the competition of ideas; freedom of association; the right to bear arms; etc. Marxism rejects these fundamental principles and values, and demands, in practice, the centralization of power over things small and large; control over the individual; conformity and obedience; uniformity of ideas and thought; and an elaborate, intrusive, and far-reaching police state to enforce its rule. This also describes the nature and character of the Democrat Party.
Antonio Gramsci argued, “a long march through [America’s cultural] institutions,” where intellectuals (broadly defined) would populate these institutions, slowly but surely radicalize them, soften existing societal morals, and ultimately destroy the culture and restructure society. 39
Alinsky’s rules for balkanizing and dividing society, undermining faith in America’s institutions, and laying the groundwork for revolution have had a gravely deleterious effect on the nation’s civility, rule of law, and tranquility. Here are his rules: 1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have. 2. Never go outside the expertise of your people. 3. Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy. 4. Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. 5. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage. 6. A good tactic is one your people enjoy. 7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. 8. Keep the pressure on. 9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. 10. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. 11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counter side; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative. 12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. 13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. 44

Chapter Two: Anti-Black Racism & Anti-Semitism

battle between the Republican Party and the Democrat Party—the latter conflict of which is rarely mentioned and certainly not emphasized.
Wilson’s backing for eugenics was common among progressives. Indeed, progressivism and eugenics were interdependent. “Progressive Era eugenics was, in fact, the broadest of churches,” states Leonard. “It was mainstream; it was popular to the point of faddishness; it was supported by leading figures in the newly emerging science of genetics; it appealed to an extraordinary range of political ideologies, not just progressives; and it survived the Nazis.… Eugenic ideas were not new in the Progressive Era, but they acquired new impetus with the Progressive Era advent of a more expansive government.
When Adolf Hitler was in prison, he read Madison Grant’s The Passing of the Great Race, wrote Madison Grant a fan letter saying, ‘This book is my bible,’ and when he wrote Mein Kampf, his autobiography, he said, ‘We Germans must emulate what the Americans are doing.’
One of the most avid and influential advocates of eugenics was Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood,
Sanger made many documented racist declarations throughout her life. For example, she wrote: “Eugenics is… the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.” 9 She argued that “[ b] irth control is not contraception indiscriminately and thoughtlessly practiced. It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and gradual suppression, elimination and eventual expiration of defective stocks—those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”
Wilson was the truly first president, and a Democrat at that, to widely institute the kind of administrative-state governance, supposedly relying on “scientific” and expert knowledge, that progressivism demands.
Even more than Wilson, Roosevelt altered the role of the American government. Roosevelt created a labyrinth of agencies, departments, programs, subsidies, etc.
Let us add some truth to Roosevelt’s record. For example, in 1942, after Imperial Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, in which 120,000 Japanese Americans, including 70,000 United States citizens, were forcibly relocated by the U.S. Army to internment camps in remote parts of the country.
In 1944, in Korematsu v. United States, the Supreme Court, the majority of whose members were appointed by Roosevelt, upheld the internment order in a 6–3 decision.
Roosevelt established the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) in 1934. Its ostensible purpose was to insure mortgages, thereby promoting homeownership. However, it furthered racial segregation by specifically denying insurance in and around black neighborhoods.
Incredibly, “the FHA was subsidizing builders who were mass-producing entire subdivisions for whites—with the requirement that none of the homes be sold to African-Americans.…
‘redlining’…
Roosevelt infamously and unceremoniously slighted the great black Olympian Jesse Owens.
Roosevelt refused to support federal antilynching legislation.
Roosevelt refused to reintegrate the armed forces, which Wilson had resegregated.
Roosevelt’s purposeful inaction during the Holocaust, to assist Jews being slaughtered by the millions, was contemptible and unconscionable.
Solicitor General for the Interior Department in the 1940s—‘would not lift a finger’ to help them. His was the administration that kept the immigration quotas 90% under-filled—meaning it could have saved 190,000 Jews under the existing quotas, without changing the immigration laws.
His was the administration that sent planes to bomb German oil factories less than five miles from the gas chambers of Auschwitz, but refused to instruct them to drop bombs on the gas chambers, or the railway lines, even after receiving maps and detailed information about what was happening in the camp.
T] he US immigration quota from Germany was filled for the first time in 1939, and almost filled in 1940. In all other years of Nazi rule (1933–1945) the quota was not filled.”
Roosevelt “blamed Polish Jews for anti-Semitism in Poland; spoke of the ‘understandable complaints’ of the Germans about the prominence of Jews in some professions; boasted to a colleague that ‘[ w] e know we have no Jewish blood in our veins’; helped bring about a quota on Jewish students admitted to Harvard; and recommended that Jews be ‘spread out thin’ around the world so they would not dominate any particular economy or culture.”
Democrat senator Robert Byrd.
President Lyndon Johnson is credited for his support of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Yet Johnson was notoriously and personally racist in many ways,
President Joe Biden, in the early to mid-1970s, as a senator, had a close relationship with several of the Senate’s most notorious racists and segregationists, about which he brags to this day, including Mississippi senator James Eastland, who fought hard against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Biden worked closely with Eastland, among others, to thwart public school integration.
Keep in mind that the early progressive intellectuals, including John Dewey, who was probably the most influential among them, were infatuated with the 1917 Russian Revolution and Stalin in the 1920s and 1930s. 73 Indeed, Dewey, who had an enormous influence on the direction of public education in America, wrote admiringly of Stalin’s educational system—that is, Stalin’s use of brainwashing.

Chapter Three: Anti-White Racism & Anti-Semitism

Although Karl Marx did not emphasize race when defining class struggles (in fact, he never defined what he meant by class despite incessantly referencing it), his American progeny did, in fact, link the two.
Among the most prominent among the movement’s advocates were several black Marxist intellectuals, such as W. E. B. Du Bois. They argued that America’s capitalist system was built on slavery and the exploitation of slaves by the white race.
In 1800, Congress passed the Act Prohibiting the Importation of Slaves, which took effect in 1808.3
Less than 25 percent of the South was wealthy enough to own slaves.
the North did not rely on slavery to build its industrial capacity. Indeed, “[ w] hile factories were built all over the North and South, the vast majority of industrial manufacturing was taking place in the North. The South had almost 25% of the country’s free population, but only 10% of the country’s capital in 1860. The North had five times the number of factories as the South, and over ten times the number of factory workers. In addition, 90% of the nation’s skilled workers were in the North.”
“1860 the North had over 110,000 manufacturing establishments, the South just 18,000. The North produced 94 percent of the country’s iron, 97 percent of its coal and—not incidentally—97 percent of its firearms. It contained 22,000 miles of railroad to the South’s 8,500. The North outperformed the South agriculturally as well. Northerners held 75 percent of the country’s farm acreage, produced 60 percent of its livestock, 67 percent of its corn, and 81 percent of its wheat. All in all, they held 75 percent of the nation’s total wealth.”
Peter W. Wood, president of the National Association of Scholars, explains: “Slavery… was not an American invention, or a European one. It has existed in human societies for thousands of years. In north and east Africa, slave capture and trading were pursued on an enormous scale by Arabs. When Europeans encountered native kingdoms on Africa’s Atlantic coast in the fifteenth century, they discovered slavery as a deeply embedded practice. That the Portuguese and the Spanish fostered this practice by creating a market for African slaves in the New World is among the great tragedies of human history. Other European powers eventually joined in perpetuating that tragedy.”
his review of Nikole Hannah-Jones’s 1619 docuseries, Magness points out that “[ e] quating capitalism with the exploitation of workers certainly serves the purpose of designating chattel slavery as a capitalistic institution, but it is simply not an accurate—or even functional—definition of the concept. Ancient Roman slavery, medieval feudalism, Soviet-era gulags, and North Korean prison camps today would also qualify as ‘capitalism’ if we reduce the concept to exploitive worker conditions.…”
she insists that slavery and capitalism are inextricably linked, and she proceeds from there to cheerlead for Marxism.
racial capitalism.”
Cedric J. Robinson, influential in radical circles but mostly unknown by the body politic, took Du Bois’s views a step further in his book Black Marxism: The Making of Black Radical Tradition.
In other words, anti-black racism is in the nation’s DNA thanks in large part to capitalism.
It was the Progressive Era—that is, the early American Marxists—that advocated the fundamentals of Marx, in which the “science” of eugenics and widespread racism thrived post–Civil War.
Whether a person is a slave to a plantation or to a government, he is a slave. Ask the people who escaped, say, North Korea if they had lived as slaves. Yet the Democrat Party finds Marx’s ideology more appealing than the vision of America’s founders, whom they continuously revile. Moreover, unlike capitalism, slavery is baked into Marxism.
Writing in the City Journal, Coleman Hughes points out that there are “several historical examples in which capitalism inspired antiracism. The most famous is the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court case, when a profit-hungry railroad company––upset that legally mandated segregation meant adding costly train cars––teamed up with a civil rights group to challenge racial segregation. Nor was that case unique. Privately owned bus and trolley companies in the Jim Crow South ‘frequently resisted segregation’ because ‘separate cars and sections’ were ‘too expensive,’ according to [research published in the Journal of Economic History.]”
civil rights Marxism, which has co-opted the old civil rights movement. Justice per se has been replaced with so-called economic justice—that is, economic socialism and cultural Marxism.
Ibram X. Kendi, director of the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University and a leading advocate for CRT, has written that “[ t] o say that there is widespread racial inequity caused by widespread racism, which makes the United States racist, isn’t an opinion, isn’t a partisan position, isn’t a doctrine, isn’t a left-wing construct, isn’t anti-white, and isn’t anti-American. It is a fact.”
Today, civil rights Marxism preaches and demands the opposite. For example, Kendi has declared: “The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.”
color-blind racism.
Colorblindness foists whiteness on everyone. It is another way of saying, “I view everyone as if they were white.” Your default color for sameness is white. Colorblindness strips non-white people of their uniqueness. Your default culture for sameness is white culture. When you encourage your child to be colorblind and view everyone as “the same,” you are projecting white on people of [sic] who aren’t white, negating their experiences, traditions, and uniqueness.
Colorblindness suppresses critically important narratives of oppression. Once you view everyone through a colorblind, white lens, you deny the reality that non-white people face.…
Myers explains, “[ i] f racism is conceived in practical terms as a maldistribution of socioeconomic goods and ills, then its remedy must be conceived in terms of redistribution, not only of opportunities but also of outcomes. The proper function of preferential race-classifications would then be to effect the desired redistributions.… The minimum condition of a just society, in this view, is that no historically disfavored racial group would suffer any aggregate disadvantage in the incidences of the main goods and ills whereby we measure socioeconomic well-being. The ultimate expectation is that those goods and ills would be distributed among racial groups in rough proportion to their percentages of the societal population.” 26 Thus, racism, equity, Marxism.
DePaul University professor Jason D. Hill, who happens to be black, explains in his book What Do White Americans Owe Black People: Racial Justice in the Age of Post-Oppression that this ideology is “a vicious anti-reason and, therefore, anti-life phenomenon that robs human beings of a particular method of cognition. It deprives them of integrating fundamental principles to clear and lucid thinking that leads to intelligible and reasonable actions. It cuts away at the idea of objective reality and replaces it with an unbridled and amorphous, necrotic lump of feelings that are treated as tools of cognition… a convenient cover for any subjective and personal quest for power, violation of rights, and basic human lawlessness. Even the concept of law is regarded as an oppressive construct designed by those who wish to exercise dominion over the marginalized.… Today, in the form of not just these but in manifestations of cancel culture, cultural appropriation, and successful efforts to suppress offending speech, we are witnessing the wholesale death of our civilization.… Because this philosophy is an attack against individualism, reason, progress, and the notion of truth itself, its deadliest consequence is a form of moral inversion of human beings.”
if the ideology and its toxicity are disputed, denounced, or opposed, the criticism itself is said to reinforce the evidence of white supremacy and privilege. The circuity and irrationality of the ideology are inescapable.
Since the ‘marginalization and/ or oppression of people of color’ is no longer committed by word, thought, or deed, but is based instead on an inescapable ‘socially constructed racial hierarchy’ that always ‘privileges white people’—it means that white people are engaging in racism simply by being white (and hence privileged) within this impersonal system of marginalization and oppression. A person of color is a victim of racism, by definition. A person identified as white is a racist, by definition.…”
[Hannah-Jones] alleged: ‘The white race is the biggest murderer, rapist, pillager, and thief of the modern world.’ Not only were white people in America’s past ‘barbaric devils,’ but the ‘descendants of these savage people’ continue to harm ‘the Black community’ to this day.…’
Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard explained, in the Democrat Party’s 2020 eighty-page draft platform, in which it lays out its mission and beliefs as a political organization,
Here are the fifteen references to whites:
“[ Kendi] correctly notes that blacks are more likely than whites to die of prostate cancer and breast cancer, but does not include the fact that blacks are less likely than whites to die of esophageal cancer, lung cancer, skin cancer, ovarian cancer, bladder cancer, brain cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and leukemia. Of
‘small or nonexistent before 1940,’ when America was arguably more capitalist—and certainly more racist.” 43
The Census reports that the top 20 percent of households averaged 16.7 times as much income as the bottom 20 percent can be reconciled with the BLS report that they only consumed 4.5 times as much by adding the value of the transfer payments received to the income of the bottom 20 percent and subtracting the taxes paid by the top 20 percent.”
Just Facts concluded that “after accounting for all income, charity, and non-cash welfare benefits like subsidized housing and food stamps—the poorest 20 percent of Americans consume more goods and services than the national averages for all people in most affluent countries. This includes the majority of countries in the prestigious Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), including its European members. In other words, if the United States poor were a nation, it would be one of the world’s richest.” 47
Van Jones,
At the end of the day, it is the race of the victim who is brutalized—not the race of the violent cop—that is most relevant in determining whether racial bias is a factor in police violence.
Small Business Administration (SBA) processed and distributed nearly $ 29 billion in funds allocated under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
Biden’s SBA injected explicitly racial and ethnic preferences into the priority process, asserting certain applicants are socially disadvantaged based solely on their race or ethnicity—that is, to the exclusion of white-owned businesses.
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the federal government cannot allocate limited COVID-19 relief funds based on the race and sex of the applicants.
Department of Agriculture interprets “socially disadvantaged” to include farmers or ranchers
Fannie Mae’s new Equitable Housing Finance Plan will help with appraisals and closing costs—but only if you’re black.
“Executive Order on Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government.”
equity-focused leadership across the federal government; deliver equitable outcomes through government policies, programs, and activities; deliver equitable outcomes in partnership with underserved communities; create economic opportunity in rural America and advance urban equitable development; advance equitable procurement; further advance equitable data practices.”
survey from the Survey Research Center of the School of Public & International Affairs at the University of Georgia found that precisely 0% of black respondents said that they had a ‘poor’ experience voting in 2022, compared to 0.9% of white voters.… In fact, 96.2% of black voters said their voting experience was ‘excellent’ or ‘good,’ compared to 96% of whites, a statistically insignificant difference.
Hakeem Jeffries, strongly defended his bigoted, anti-Semitic uncle Leonard Jeffries, when Hakeem Jeffries was a leading activist in college.
Scholar and author Victor Davis Hanson explains in National Review that “[ t] he new anti-Semitism that grew up in the 1960s was certainly in part legitimized by the rise of overt African-American bigotry against Jews (and coupled by a romantic affinity for Islam).
early September 2016, writes Rabbi Yaakov Menken, managing director of the Coalition for Jewish Values, in the Observer, “[ T] he Obama administration reacted angrily to a video in which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pointed out that the Palestinian Authority intended to be Judenrein, ethnically cleansed of Jews. The State Department willfully distorted Netanyahu’s remarks, asserting he was promoting Israeli settlements, and reiterating its false claim that those settlements are illegal. In other words, the Obama administration twisted a statement about Arab bigotry against Jews into a perceived injustice against Arabs.
Jewish people are the only indigenous people Obama, the Democrat Party ruling class, and their ilk do not recognize. “Jews lived in the area Jordan labeled the ‘West Bank’ continuously for the past 3,000 years,” writes Menken, “save for brief periods when they were massacred, and the survivors were forced from their homes—most recently by the Jordanian Army in 1948. To now call the Tomb of the Patriarchs and the Temple Mount ‘Arab land’ tacitly endorses Arab ethnic cleansing of Jews.” 68
Obama was disastrous for the state of Israel, as he was for the United States. He denied Israel arms for a period when it was under attack; he signed an agreement with the terrorist Iranian regime that ensured its acquisition of nuclear weapons and threatened Israel’s existence; he directed his secretary of state, John Kerry, to abstain rather than vote “no” on another anti-Semitic UN resolution against Israel; he attempted to unseat Israel’s elected prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and treated him disrespectfully when he visited the White House; and, much more.
Biden has picked up where Obama left off,
he bypassed the Taylor Force Act, which prevented United States’ funding of the Palestinians unless they stopped using the money to reward the families of Palestinian terrorists for murdering Jews

Chapter Four: Language Control & Thought Control

Dr. Joost A. M. Meerloo,
specialized in the area of thought control techniques used by totalitarian regimes.”
Delusion and Mass Delusion,
“[ t] otalitarism promotes persuasion by means of altering people’s perception of reality.…”
“The most effective way of making everybody serve the single system of ends towards which the social plan is directed is to make everybody believe in those ends.… Although the beliefs must be chosen for the people and imposed upon them, they must become their beliefs, a generally accepted creed which makes the individuals as far as possible act spontaneously in the way the planner wanted.”
The creation of a new language serves two aims: to obtain, as George Orwell put it, ‘an instrument with which to express the philosophy and thoughts that are permitted,’ and, secondly, to make ‘all other sorts of thinking impossible.’
The new language is consequently at once a means of communication and an instrument of oppression.… The word conceals reality, creates an illusion, a surrealist impression, but at the same time it preserves a link with reality and puts it into code.”
National Public Radio (NPR) recently reported: “Dictionary.com has updated thousands of entries and added hundreds of words in its largest release to date,
s] ome of the major site-wide changes to existing entries have to do with race and ethnicity, like capitalizing the word ‘Black’ in reference to people, which the company says it is doing ‘as a mark of respect and recognition that’s in line with capitalizing other cultures and ethnicities.’ Examples of entirely new terms in this category include Afro-Latino, brownface, Filipinx and whitesplain. Another dictionary-wide change replaces references to ‘homosexual’ with ‘gay, gay man or gay woman,’ and references to ‘homosexuality’ with ‘gay sexual orientation.’ The company said these updates were informed by recommendations from the organization GLAAD, and affect more than 50 entries. It has also refined the definitions for a number of other words related to LGBTQ identity, such as asexual, deadname, Pride and themself.” 13
repressive regimes, repetition is also used to force the acceptance and even internalization of new words or words with newly created meanings, and language is used to identify and condemn “enemies” of the state.
otalitarianism propaganda raised ideological scientificality and its technique of making statements in the form of predictions to a height of efficiency of method and absurdity of consent because, demagogically speaking, there is hardly a better way to avoid discussion than releasing an argument from the control of the present and by saying that only the future can reveal its merits.
Here are 18 examples of the spectacularly wrong predictions made around 1970 when the ‘green holy day’ (aka Earth Day) started:
English language is the language of domination, imperialism, and capitalism, thereby requiring a break from its historic roots and the application of Marxist ideology to fix it.
Norman Fairclough contends in his convoluted book, Language and Power:
his argument is that the capitalist, or bourgeoisie, has monopoly-like control over words and language and, therefore, unfairly possess a bigger vocabulary with which to enrich himself, exploit and oppress others, and maintain control over society. Consequently, in order to break the dominant culture, and fundamentally transform society, the English language must be revolutionized.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), focus on ‘non-stigmatizing’ language,
NIH Style Guide,
his Tablet essay “How the Media Led the Great Racial Awakening,” Zach Goldberg explains that “years before Trump’s election the media dramatically increased coverage of racism and embraced new theories of racial consciousness that set the stage for the latest unrest.…
terms like ‘microaggression’ and ‘white privilege’ were picked up by liberal journalists.
the New York Times and Washington Post] both talk about racial inequality and race-related issues far more frequently than they have since at least 1970 as well as increasingly framing those issues using the terms and jargon associated with ‘wokeness.’
‘concept creep’ originates with Nick Haslam, a professor of psychology at the University of Melbourne, Australia.
For instance,… from 1970 until 2014, the combined usage frequency of the three ‘macro-level’ racism terms—systemic racism, structural racism, institutional racism—never exceeded 0.00006% of all words in any of the four newspapers. By 2014, however, this ceiling was shattered, particularly in the Times and Post. In the final year of the series (2019), the Times… and Post… were using these terms roughly 10 times more frequently than they were in 2013.”
But as with ‘racism,’ these terms have since been radically expanded by a rapid and ideologically driven concept creep. White supremacy is now a vague and all-encompassing label.
Whatever it used to mean, ‘white supremacy’ is now everywhere and applicable to any context.” 55 Of course, the media know exactly what they are doing. They are partners in the Democrat Party’s pursuit of political domination and monopolization. Race is just one repugnant example of their evil propaganda efforts.
Political correctness is the conscious, designed manipulation of language intended to change the way people speak, write, think, feel, and act, in furtherance of an agenda.
Like totalitarian regimes, the truth is that the Democrat Party and its proxies understand that to own the language is to own the culture and society.
The Psychology of Totalitarianism, Mattias Desmet,
“Twitter Files” scandal.
Biden “disinformation board” instituted by the Department of Homeland Security.
Taibbi dared to cross the Biden administration. The same day he testified, writes the Daily Caller, he received “an unannounced home visit from an IRS agent. Taibbi was reportedly left a note by the IRS agent to call the agency four days later,
he Global Disinformation Index (GDI) [as] a particularly insidious part of [the Biden administration’s censorship] effort. Funded in part by $ 330 million from the U.S. State Department through the National Endowment for Democracy (which contributes to GDI’s budget), the GDI was designed to steer advertisers and subscribers away from ‘risky’ sites which it says pose ‘reputational and brand risk’ and to help companies avoid ‘financially supporting disinformation online.’
GDI warned advertisers that these sites could damage their reputations and brands: the New York Post, Reason, Real Clear Politics, the Daily Wire, The Blaze, One America News Network, The Federalist, Newsmax, the American Spectator, and the American Conservative.”
turn Artificial Intelligence (AI) into a Democrat Party propaganda tool for decades to come.
Voice of America, in a report titled “American College Campuses Increasingly Hostile to Free Speech,”
The Democrat Party seeks to change the American people from a freethinking, engaged, independent, curious, and industrious people to a people who are dispirited, silenced, subsidized, inattentive, and compliant.

Chapter Five: War on the American Citizen

The purpose of citizenship is to unite people around common values, belief systems, principles, etc.—that is, a dominant culture: the American culture. Otherwise, a nation cannot function and ultimately fails.
Biden and his party are overseeing and instituting the greatest degradation of our immigration laws and system in American history.
As reported by Fox News: “President-elect Joe Biden, during the Obama administration, said the U.S. benefits from a ‘constant’ and ‘unrelenting’ stream of immigration—and that those with white European heritage becoming a minority in the U.S. is ‘a source of our strength.’ ”
Biden said a key to U.S. economic strength is the “constant, unrelenting stream of immigrants into the country. Not dribbling. Significant flows.”
Thomas G. West, professor of politics at Hillsdale College, reveals in his 1998 book, Vindicating the Founders, that although many of the nation’s founders were receptive to immigration, there were important caveats. He explains that “George Washington frequently commented on immigration and citizenship. His approach, shared by most of the founding generation, had two main features. First, America should generously welcome as equal citizens people from many nations and religions. Second, the numbers and kinds of immigrants may need to be limited with a view to the qualities of character required for democratic citizenship.”
Alexander Hamilton, who was not opposed to immigration from Europe (which was where most immigrants at the time were coming from), rejected the notion that every foreigner, or masses of foreigners, had a right to migrate to the United States; he also believed it would be highly detrimental to the nation. Hamilton wrote, in part:
The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on the love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education, and family. The opinion advanced in Notes of Virginia is undoubtedly correct, that foreigners will generally be apt to bring with them attachments to the persons they have left behind; to the country of their nativity, and to its particular customs and manners. They will also entertain opinions on government congenial with those under which they have lived; or if they should be hither from a preference to ours, how extremely unlikely is it that they will bring with them that temperate love of liberty, so essential to real republicanism?
America’s founding fathers believed that the purpose of immigration is to benefit the existing citizenry and society, not the interests of aliens who wish to come to the United States. After all, the representatives of the people are supposed to represent the people. That is the point of representative government, not championing the interests of foreign nationals.
It believes new immigrants can be more easily indoctrinated, manipulated, and persuaded by the party’s advocacy of civil-rights Marxism and political authoritarianism.
Moreover, today, assimilation is a much more difficult challenge than in the past because the American culture itself is being eradicated from within by the various American Marxist movements and the Democrat Party, something the founders could never have imagined. The critical question then becomes: To what are immigrants being assimilated and integrated?
1998, the late Harvard professor Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., a renowned Democrat Party activist, scholar, and traditional liberal, who was an adviser to Democrat presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson and President John Kennedy, wrote a book titled The Disunity of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society, in which he condemned in dire terms and profound arguments the immigration policies that were tearing at the fabric of American culture and society twenty-five years ago. For example, he wrote: “The ethnicity rage in general and Afrocentricity in particular not only divert attention from the real needs but exacerbate the problems. The recent apotheosis of ethnicity, black, brown, red, yellow, white, has revived the dismal prospect that in melting-pot days Americans thought the republic was moving safely beyond—that is, a society fragmented into separate ethnic communities. The cult of ethnicity exaggerates differences, intensifies resentments and antagonisms, drives deeper the awful wedges between races and nationalities. The endgame is self-pity and self-ghettoization.” 12
Samuel Huntington explains that “[ i] n 1900 the answer was clear: assimilation meant Americanization. In 2000 the answers were complicated, contradictory, and ambiguous. Many elite Americans were no longer confident of the virtue of their mainstream culture and instead preached a doctrine of diversity and the equal validity of all cultures in America. ‘Immigrants do not enter a society that assumes an undifferentiated monolithic culture,’
Mary Waters [sociologist and Harvard professor] observed in 1994, ‘but rather a consciously pluralistic society in which a variety of subcultures and racial and ethnic identities coexist.’ To the extent that America has become multicultural, immigrants may choose among the subcultures they encounter or choose to maintain their original culture. They may assimilate into American society without assimilating the core American culture. Assimilation and Americanization are no longer identical.”
“Historically, the public schools were central in the promotion of national identity. In the late twentieth century, in contrast, schools promoted diversity rather than unity and made little effort to inculcate immigrants in American culture, traditions, customs, and beliefs.… In a society that values ethnic and racial diversity, immigrants have powerful incentives to maintain and to reaffirm their ancestral identity.”
Democrat Party ideological agendas are now rampant throughout school systems and imposed on schoolchildren, such as CRT; “climate change”; LGBTQ +/ transgenderism; and, mostly anti-Americanism.
Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), has written: “In their first 100 days, the Biden administration took over 90 executive actions on immigration, many of which dismantled an effective system, making it easier for migrants to illegally enter and stay for good. Nearly every follow-up executive action or policy decision… has been used to launder the crisis—not end it. The administration also immediately sent a 353-page mass amnesty bill to Congress, the same proposal consistently referenced ‘as a comprehensive immigration reform plan’ that will solve the crisis they intentionally started. In reality, it is a reward to lawbreakers and an invitation to the entire world, and we are still seeing the effects of making it public.”
Biden administration’s regulation provides more protections to illegal entrants, while removing safeguards protecting the most essential of U.S. interests—citizenship.”
“He is the author of Invisible Slaves: The Victims and Perpetrators of Modern-Day Slavery. ‘The huge increase in illegal immigration caused by the rescission of prior immigration practices, policies, and laws by the Biden Administration, and the violation of human rights that has accompanied many of these immigrants—including coercion, violence, rape, debts, and payments[—] would qualify as human trafficking,’ Hauser said. ‘That is slavery.’ ”33
a study by FAIR finds that as a result of Biden’s policies, “[ p] ublic school districts across the United States continue to suffer under a massive unfunded mandate imposed by the federal government: the requirement to educate millions of illegal aliens, the school-age children of illegal aliens, and unassimilated/ unvetted refugees, all at taxpayer expense.
FAIR estimates that it currently costs public schools just over $ 78 billion to serve this burgeoning population based on data from 2020. The struggle to fund programs for students with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) represents a major drain on school budgets as they redirect resources away from American citizens to support English learner programs for this cohort. Currently, 5.1 million students—or more than 10 percent of all students in American public schools—are designated as LEP.”
Democrat Party sees mass immigration as an imperative to gaining, retaining, and exercising power.
Third, for years the Democrat Party and its media surrogates have accused the Republican Party of supporting “the replacement theory,” which is said to be a “right-wing,” “white supremacist,” etc., concept that is both racist and dangerous.
Of course, to raise questions about the Democrat Party’s disastrous policies is to be accused of racism, white supremacy, and so forth—more evidence of a white-dominant culture barely holding on in a browning America. The goal is to intimidate and silence those who object to the devastating consequences of Democrat Party open-borders policies to American citizens and immigrants alike. 58
Richard Lamm,
five-minute speech in 2004 in Washington, D.C., on how to destroy America.
If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that “an autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” First, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way: “The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans.” Second, to destroy America, invent multiculturalism and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the black and Hispanic dropout rates are due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds. Third, we could make the United States a Hispanic Quebec without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: “The apparent success of our own multi-ethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved! Not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.” I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities. Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school. My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of victimology. I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population. My sixth plan for America’s downfall would include dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other—that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity! Unity is what it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games. A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. E Pluribus Unum—from many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the “pluribus” instead of the “unum,” we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo. Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits—make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of diversity. I would find a word similar to heretic in the 16th century—that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like racist or xenophobes halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/ bicultural country, having established multiculturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of victimology, I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That’s because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them. Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hanson’s book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don’t read that book. 65

Chapter Six: War on the Nuclear Family

The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx declared: “Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists among the bourgeois. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution. The bourgeois family will vanish with the vanishing of capital. Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty. But, you will say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations when we replace home education by social.” 1
Marx specifically drilled down on the essential necessity to replace parental care, love, nurturing, teaching, and moral guidance with the priorities of the egalitarianism and communality of the state.
Richard Weikart, professor of history at California State University, explained in his essay “Marx, Engels, and the Abolition of the Family”
of unmarried women is growing every year. From the earliest census up through 1950, roughly 80% of households were led by a married couple. By 2000, that percentage had fallen to 52%, and by 2010, for the first time in the nation’s history, most households did not include a married couple.
68% of unmarried women voted for Democrats.”
Biden administration has now released “a series of documents encouraging gender-reassignment surgery and hormone treatments for minors.
Biden administration released the gender-affirming care document, “the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s National Child Traumatic Stress Network—another subset of the HHS—released a parallel document titled, ‘Gender-Affirming Care Is Trauma-Informed Care.’
“U.S. Becomes Transgender-Care Outlier as More in Europe Urge Caution,” the Wall Street Journal reports:
Leor Sapir, who studies gender care at the Manhattan Institute, told the Journal: “These countries have done systematic reviews of evidence. They’ve found that the studies cited to support these medical interventions are too unreliable, and the risks are too serious.”
New York Post’s Josh Christenson reports: “More than 3.2 million U.S. public school students are covered by guidance that blocks parents from knowing whether their child identifies as a different gender in the classroom—which could become federal policy if President Biden’s Title IX proposals are approved.… At least 168 districts governing 5,904 schools nationwide have rules on the books that prevent faculty and staff from disclosing to parents a student’s gender status without that student’s permission, according to a list compiled by… Defending Education.… The 3,268,752 students affected by such policies go to class in all kinds of districts—large and small, affluent and poor, urban and rural, red and blue—stretching from North Carolina to Alaska.”
reported by the New York Post, “Karey Burke, president of Disney’s General Entertainment Content, vowed to drastically increase inclusivity in its productions, promising that at least 50 percent of its characters will be LGBTQ or racial minorities by the end of the year.”
Dr. Debra Soh, an expert sexologist, makes the point in her book The End of Gender: Debunking the Myths about Sex and Identity in Our Society, that “[ a] ctivist organizations have managed to infect much of the information that is available relating to both gender and biological sex. Any research studies that are not in agreement with this agenda are ignored as though they never existed. Whether it’s health websites, research publications, or media articles, it really is a jungle out there. If what you are looking for is basic, foundational information, anything older than ten years old is probably safe. Anything published in the last few years is questionable.”
Heritage’s Jonathan Butcher also reveals that “[ t] he National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) recommended Critical Race Theory in Mathematics Education
“46 of the top 100 medical schools have offered materials by authors Robin DiAngelo or Ibram X. Kendi,
New York Post, “Top med school putting wokeism ahead of giving America good doctors,” Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, chairman of Do No Harm,
“The Blue City Murder Problem,” the Heritage Foundation
highlighted that 27 of the top 30 cities with the highest murder rates as of June 2022 were run by Democratic mayors.… Moreover, 14 of the 30 cities with the highest murder rates have ‘[ George] Soros-backed or Soros-inspired rogue prosecutors.…
“Murder rates in liberal-run cities across the United States have risen 10% since 2021 due to defund-the-police movements and soft-on-crime policies supported by left-wing [Democrat] mayors.
2005, Kay S. Hymowitz, who has written widely about marriage, explained in National Review, in part, that “72 percent of black children… are born to unmarried mothers;… large numbers of those children… will have at best erratic relationships with their fathers;… children living with an unrelated father are more likely to suffer abuse;… there is abundant evidence that boys growing up under these conditions have less self-control than those growing up in more stable families;… and most of all,… those boys are far more prone to commit crimes.…” 84
AEI-Brookings Working Group on Childhood in the United States reports that “[ c] urrently, means-tested programs such as Medicaid, the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) penalize low-income couples who choose to marry including working-class Americans, with one study showing that more than 70 percent of American families with young children and incomes in the second and third income quintiles face marriage penalties related to Medicaid, cash welfare, or SNAP receipt. These
marry; one survey found that almost one-third of Americans ages 18 to 60 report they personally know someone who has not married for fear of losing means-tested benefits.”
Haskins and Isabel Sawhill have called the success sequence, in which young adults are encouraged to pursue education, work, marriage, and parenthood, in that order. Today, 97 percent of young adults who follow this sequence are not poor in midlife. While the sequence has not been proven to exercise a casual role in adults’ economic lives, an extensive body of research indicates that each step—that is, education, work, and marriage—is associated with better economic outcomes for families with children.”
Milton Friedman explained that “[ i] nflation is an old, old disease. We’ve had thousands of years of experience with it. There is nothing simpler than stopping an inflation—from the technical point of view.… The only cure for inflation is to reduce the rate at which total [government] spending is growing.”
Despite its “get the rich” and Marxist class-warfare propaganda, the Democrat Party has abandoned the working middle class—as most Marxist-centered movements have and do. Axios reports: “Nine of the top 10 wealthiest congressional districts are represented by Democrats, while Republicans now represent most of the poorer half of the country.… The last several decades have ushered in a dramatic political realignment, as the GOP has broadened its appeal to a more diverse working class and Democrats have become the party of wealthier, more-educated voters. ‘We have seen an inversion of Democrat and Republican shares of the highest-and lowest-income districts—and the highest and lowest college degree-holding districts,’ says Cook Political Report’s Dave Wasserman.
Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager—with an estimated $ 10 trillion in assets—has been a leading advocate for imposing environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, on American corporations.
ESG is nothing but a scheme to take shareholders’ and consumer funds to subsidize the American Marxist agenda. It is used to reward “woke” behavior and punish traditional investors focused on increasing their returns. Simply put, ESG takes a portion of your money without your knowledge or permission—such as your pension fund investments—to push radical Democrat Party policies, and cuts financial investments in, for examples, oil and gas companies. Therefore, not only are you subsidizing the demise of the country, you are likely not receiving the highest returns for your investments—again, without your knowledge or approval.

Chapter Seven: War on the Constitution

radical leftist Ruth Colker, professor at Moritz College of Law, the Ohio State University, is illustrative of this modern assault on the Constitution itself. Key to this attack is to try to link the Constitution to slavery. She writes in the opening salvo of her essay titled “The White Supremacist Constitution” that “[ t] he United States Constitution is a document that, during every era, has helped further white supremacy. White supremacy constitutes a ‘political, economic and cultural system in which whites overwhelmingly control power and material resources, conscious and unconscious ideas of white superiority and entitlement are widespread, and relations of white dominance and non-white subordination are daily reenacted across a broad array of institutions and social settings.’
Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution. Like Colker, he declares that the United States is and always has been a corrupt society, and the Constitution is nothing but an accumulation of demands of immoral white people enshrined in a document and imposed on the nation.
Former law professor Robert Natelson, now of the Independence Institute, explains: “To begin with, the dominant view among the Founders was that slavery was absolutely not ‘fine.’ The prevailing view was that slavery violated natural law and was doomed to extinction. Indeed, by 1787 several states had begun the journey toward abolition. Nor did the Constitution create or mandate slavery or racial discrimination. These were creations of state law, and they varied from state to state. The Founders were forced to accept that situation to prevent America from fracturing into a multitude of nations constantly at war with each other, as in Europe. Also false is the common claim that slaveholders adopted the Constitution. Of the public that ratified it, only a small percentage owned slaves. And perhaps as many slaveholders opposed the Constitution as favored it. In [at least] five states, the ratifying electorate included free African Americans.” 4
infamous three-fifths clause, which more nonsense has been written than any other clause, does not declare that a black person is worth 60 percent of a white person. It says that for purposes of determining the number of representatives for each state in the House (and direct taxes), the government would count only three-fifths of the slaves, and not all of them, as the Southern states, who wanted to gain more seats, had insisted.
ecause the Constitution does not explicitly recognize slavery and does not therefore admit that slaves were property, all the protections it affords to persons could be applied to slaves. ‘Anyone of these provisions in the hands of abolition statesmen, and backed up by a right moral sentiment, would put an end to slavery in America,’ Frederick Douglass concluded.
The Constitution did, however, empower Congress to prevent its spread and set it on a course of extinction, while leaving the states free to abolish it within their own territory at any time. Regrettably, early Congresses did not pursue a consistent anti-slavery policy. This, however, is not an indictment of the Constitution itself. As Douglass explained: ‘A chart is one thing, the course of a vessel is another. The Constitution may be right, the government wrong.’
Framers were highly accomplished, mostly well educated, and avid readers of history and philosophy. If, in fact, they wanted to institutionalize and enshrine slavery into American society, why did they not do so? The Constitution would have been the perfect vehicle through which to do

THE FIRST AMENDMENT

Although the proposed amendment was defeated, the fact that the Democrat Party bill was drafted and put up for a vote was shocking—and underscores its totalitarian nature. Tim Burris at Forbes explained: “[ T] he amendment would create a world where pornography, videos depicting small animals being crushed, profanity-laden jackets, and Phelps family funeral protests all receive more protection from government interference than even the smallest amount of political speech. By giving Congress and state governments essentially unlimited power to prohibit or regulate anyone who is spending money trying to ‘influence elections,’ the Senate stooped to a level of governmental malfeasance previously reserved for the former Soviet Union,
The point is that if the Democrat Party has its way, which it soon may, free political speech, including criticism of governmental policy, will be severely limited, and violators will be subject to punishment by the government. This is police state censorship.
Intercept reported: “[ The Biden administration’s]… Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is quietly broadening its efforts to curb speech it considers dangerous.… Years of internal DHS memos, emails, and documents—obtained via leaks and an ongoing lawsuit, as well as public documents—illustrate an expansive effort by the agency to influence tech platforms. The work, much of which remains unknown to the American public, came into clearer view earlier this year when DHS announced a new ‘Disinformation Governance Board’:
U.S. District Judge Terry A. Doughty carefully examined the states’ evidence for seeking a preliminary injunction against the Biden administration to stop the government from hijacking social-media platforms in “the most massive attack against free speech in U.S. history.” 25 In
April 2023, the Department of Justice inspector general, Michael Horowitz, testified before a House committee that “[ m] ore than one million secret searches of Americans conducted by the FBI were made erroneously.… Around 30 percent of the approximately 3.4 million searches were done in error.… The searches in question were conducted by FBI personnel with the authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
The Washington Examiner reports that at the IRS, “[ a] second IRS whistleblower has alleged retaliation for raising concerns that Justice Department leadership was ‘acting inappropriately’ on the investigation into Hunter Biden.
The Democrat Party is also pushing to deplatform news groups and individuals with whom they disagree.
Washington Examiner’s Gabe Kaminsky reported: “Well-funded ‘disinformation’ tracking groups are part of a stealth operation blacklisting and trying to defund conservative media, likely costing the news companies large sums in advertising dollars.… Major ad companies are increasingly seeking guidance from purportedly ‘nonpartisan’ groups claiming to be detecting and fighting online ‘disinformation.’
Global Disinformation Index, a British group with two affiliated U.S. nonprofit groups sharing similar board members, is one entity shaping the ad world behind the scenes.
“GDI, which did not reply to several requests for its exclusion list, discloses in reports which outlets it identifies as the ‘riskiest’ and ‘worst’ offenders for peddling disinformation. These 10, which all skew to the right, are the American Spectator, Newsmax, the Federalist, the American Conservative, One America News, the Blaze, the Daily Wire, RealClearPolitics, Reason, and the New York Post.… On the flip side, all of the websites that GDI ranks as the ‘least risky’ lean left in their news coverage—minus the Wall Street Journal. These include NPR, ProPublica, the Associated Press, Insider, the New York Times, USA Today, the Washington Post, Buzzfeed News, and HuffPost, according to a 27-page report.
GDI “has received $ 330,000 from two State Department-backed entities linked to the highest levels of government.…” 36 NewsBusters also reports that “GDI has three advisory board members with ties to leftist billionaire George Soros, according to MRC Free Speech America research… Advisory Panel member Finn Heinreich is Soros’ Open Society Initiative for Europe division director for transparency, accountability, and participation.
Soros-funded Poynter Institute’s International Fact Checking Network
all. For example, ProPublica is a left-wing operation that fancies itself an “independent, nonprofit newsroom that produces investigative journalism with moral force” and is funded by charitable sources.
Washington Examiner, explains that ProPublica “is funded by left-wing megadonors who pump money into court-packing advocacy groups,” such as the controversial Sandler Foundation.
Wilson signed an amendment to the Espionage Act with even more restrictive limits on speech and press in 1918.
Wilson’s real targets were political opponents and opposition newspapers. He used the laws to “close down about 75 newspapers and magazines, prevent the distribution of specific issues of many more, and put journalists on trial in federal courts.”
Even though these laws and Wilson’s tyranny violated the First Amendment, the Supreme Court upheld them. The 1918 Sedition amendments to the Espionage Act were repealed in December 1920, at the behest of the newly elected Republican president, Warren Harding, who was no fan of the laws. But the 1917 Espionage Act (with subsequent amendments) remains federal law. Indeed, it is now being used in the prosecution of President Trump,
to former Hillsdale College professor Burton Folsom Jr., “[ Franklin] Roosevelt marveled at the potential of the IRS for removing political opponents. Newspaper publisher William Randolph Hearst… found himself under investigation when he began opposing Roosevelt’s political programs. In fact,… Eleanor Roosevelt sicced the IRS on conservative newspaper publisher Frank Gannett, who at the time was also vice chairman of the Republican National Committee.” 47
Roosevelt and the New York Times, among other news outlets, also worked together to censor information about the extermination of millions of European Jews by Adolf Hitler and his Third Reich Nazis, which kept the American people in the dark about the Holocaust until 1944.50 I discuss that at length in Unfreedom of the Press.
President Barack Obama, who has claimed repeatedly that his administration was scandal free, and his attorney general, Eric Holder, unleashed federal police powers against targeted media outlets.
Washington Post executive editor, Leonard Downie, Jr., wrote the 30-page analysis titled ‘The Obama Administration and the Press.’ He explained: ‘In the Obama administration’s Washington, government officials are increasingly afraid to talk to the press. The administration’s war on leaks and other efforts to control information are the most aggressive I’ve seen since the Nixon administration, when I was one of the editors involved in The Washington Post’s investigation of Watergate.…’ ‘There’s no question that sources are looking over their shoulders,’ Michael Oreskes,
Obama administration enlisted the assistance of the IRS against the Tea Party.
First Amendment also protects the free exercise of religion—freedom of religion—from government usurpation. However, as the Democrat Party has massively expanded the welfare state and the nation transitions further from constitutional republicanism, especially since the New Deal, and secularism increasingly replaces faith in the American culture, as Marx demanded, the degradation of religious liberty is profoundly troubling. Religion and faith, like the nuclear family, must give way to the “greater good” and “best interests of the communal” if society is to be truly “just and equitable.”
News of Biden’s latest war on religious liberty was selectively leaked to the media this week. A draft memo by OCR to HHS indicates the Biden administration is planning to revoke the Trump administration’s policies governing religious liberty, including conscience rights. HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, who has a long record of trampling on religious liberty, is working in tandem with OCR to eviscerate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). In his capacity as California Attorney General, he sued the Little Sisters of the Poor for resisting the HHS mandate of the Obama administration; it tried to force the nuns to provide for abortion-inducing drugs in their healthcare plans.”
Gavin Newsom, was among the most aggressive chief executives in the nation violating religious liberty rights. “A 6-3 U.S. Supreme Court ruling sided with house-bound pastors and their congregants in their claim Newsom’s bans on worship services in an effort to stop the spread of coronavirus unfairly singled out churches, in violation of the First Amendment.
Richmond Field Office of the FBI released in a newly finished intelligence product dated January 23, 2023, on Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists (RMVE) and their interests in ‘Radical-Traditionalist Catholics’ or RTCs. The document assesses with ‘high confidence’ the FBI can mitigate the threat of Radical-Traditionalist Catholics by recruiting sources within the Catholic Church.… While most Americans are familiar with criminal investigations, which explore the allegation or information that a crime has been committed, many are not familiar with intelligence investigations. In contrast to the linear nature of a criminal case, counterintelligence and counterterrorism cases follow a circular path that can continue indefinitely without any articulated goal. Indeed, information is the goal of these types of cases. Many counterterrorism cases never articulate or uncover a single criminal act. Yet they continue in order to develop more understanding of the ‘threat landscape’ or ‘threat pictures,’ as quoted in this document. Intelligence investigations often beget more investigations. The relevance of this product should not be lost on the reader.” 63
case of Mark Houck. The Department of Justice sent approximately twenty heavily armed FBI agents to arrest Houck early in the morning and in front of his family (including several young children) for allegedly violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act.
Houck was charged with two federal counts of violating the FACE Act for allegedly pushing a pro-abortion activist in front of an abortion clinic after the activist had allegedly shoved his twelve-year-old son.
“The Women’s Health Protection Act,”

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Franklin Roosevelt’s disdain for the constitutional and institutional limits placed on him and the presidency, shared by the modern Democrat Party, reached into the Supreme Court.
KR suggests that term limits for justices—something I first raised in Men in Black nearly twenty years ago, albeit having nothing to do with KR’s pro-abortion position—was worth pursuing given the increasingly politicized nature of activist justices.
KR and the Democrat Party simply want to save the country by destroying the Constitution.
hortly after the leak of the draft opinion [of the Dobbs opinion] indicating Roe v. Wade would soon be overturned, the radical pro-abortion group Ruth Sent Us began urging protesters to go to the homes of the ‘six extremist justices, three in Virginia and three in Maryland.’ Those justices were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch. ShutDownDC, a leftist group that has protested at the family homes of Republican Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley and commentator Tucker Carlson, also called for protesting at the justices’ houses and even offered bounties for sightings of the justices.

THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

“More than two centuries after it was designed to empower southern white voters, the system continues to do just that.” 99 Thus, the Electoral College supposedly helps Republicans and was and is racist.
Professor Allen Guelzo, American historian and research scholar at Princeton University, and James H. Hulme, former head of ArentFox Schiff’s litigation department, wrote “In Defense of the Electoral College” that slavery had nothing to do with the Electoral College. “Some historians have branded the Electoral College this way because each state’s electoral votes are based on that ‘whole Number of Senators and Representatives’ from each State, and in 1787 the number of those representatives was calculated on the basis of the infamous three-fifths clause. But the Electoral College merely reflected the numbers, not any bias about slavery (and in any case, the three-fifths clause was not quite a proslavery compromise as it seems, since Southern slaveholders wanted their slaves counted as five-fifths for determining representation in Congress, and had to settle for a whittled-down fraction). As much as the abolitionists before the Civil War liked to talk about the ‘proslavery Constitution,’ this was more of a rhetorical posture than a serious historical argument.
committed to one-party autocratic rule is the Democrat Party that Democrat states and the Democrat Party are looking for ways around the Electoral College without going through the constitutional amendment process. They have come up with a devious scheme—the National Popular Vote (NPV). The Heritage Foundation’s Hans A. von Spakovsky explains that “the NPV scheme proposes an interstate compact in which participating states agree in advance to automatically allocate their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote, disregarding the popular vote results in their states or what the relevant legislatures might then desire.

THE DEBT CEILING

The federal debt may seem like an obscure and boring topic, but it determines whether Americans will continue to enjoy economic prosperity, especially for our children and grandchildren, and generations yet born.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report titled “The Nation’s Fiscal Health,” which received virtually no media attention. The report is a stark warning that the federal government is fiscally out of control.
debt held by the public was about 97 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).
reckless and unconscionable federal spending and borrowing are not curbed and reversed, the federal government will drag the entire country into an economic and national security disaster.
grant the executive the power of the purse (rather than Congress) means the president would have virtually complete control over the federal government’s financial activities.
In the most recent debt ceiling battle, Biden said that he believes he does have this power. In May 2023, he stated: “I’m looking at the Fourteenth Amendment as to whether or not we have the authority—I think we have the authority. The question is, could it be done and invoked in time that it would not be appealed, and as a consequence past the date in question and still default on the debt. That is a question that I think is unresolved.” 113
conga line of Democrat Party members of Congress and the usual radical law professors have weighed in, almost exclusively for “interpreting” the Fourteenth Amendment to accommodate Biden’s massive spending and borrowing binge.
Revisiting Friedrich Hayek and his book The Road to Serfdom, Hayek made the point that “[ t] he most effective way of making people accept the validity of the values they are to serve is to persuade them that they are really the same as those which they, or at least the best among them, have always held, but which were not properly understand or recognized before. The people are made to transfer their allegiance from the old gods to the new under the pretense that the new gods really are what their sound instinct had always told them would be what before they had only dimly seen. And the most effective technique to this end is to use the old words but change their meaning. Few traits of totalitarian regimes are at the same time so confusing to the superficial observer and yet so characteristic of the whole intellectual climate as the complete perversion of language, the change of meaning of the words by which the ideals of the regimes are expressed. The worst sufferer in this respect is, of course, the word ‘liberty.’ It is a word used as freely in totalitarian states as elsewhere.” 120

Chapter Eight: Stalin Would Be Proud

Democrat Party’s scorched earth, unscrupulous, and unconscionable political and criminal persecution of Donald Trump is totalitarian in every respect. Joseph Stalin and his henchman, Lavrentiy Beria, would be proud.

Epilogue

And when the Democrat Party wins elections, it continues building upon the permanent parts of the government infrastructure it firmly controls. Thus, the Democrat Party single-handedly builds permanent centers of power, including in the vast federal bureaucracy, subsidized nongovernment organizations, lifetime activist judges, tenured professors and teachers, party members in the media, etc. The Democrat Party uses the culture and politics to empower itself and its agenda. And Democrats have no intention of surrendering control of either. Consequently, when the Democrat Party wins elections, it claims broad mandates; when it loses elections, it ignores the popular will of the people and turns to the permanent government and its cultural surrogates to sabotage the Republicans and push forward their American Marxist agenda. Consequently, over time, it becomes increasingly difficult to reverse the Democrat Party’s political and cultural damage.

The Democrat Party Hates America

Chapter One: The Democrat Party & Authoritarianism

Chapter Two: Anti-Black Racism & Anti-Semitism

Chapter Three: Anti-White Racism & Anti-Semitism

Chapter Four: Language Control & Thought Control

Chapter Five: War on the American Citizen

Chapter Six: War on the Nuclear Family

Chapter Seven: War on the Constitution

Chapter Eight: Stalin Would Be Proud

Epilogue

TheDemocrat_Party_Hates**America**

Chapter One: The Democrat Party & Authoritarianism

Chapter Two: Anti-Black Racism & Anti-Semitism

Chapter Three: Anti-White Racism & Anti-Semitism

Chapter Four: Language Control & Thought Control

Chapter Five: War on the American Citizen

Chapter Six: War on the Nuclear Family

Chapter Seven: War on the Constitution

THE FIRST AMENDMENT

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

THE DEBT CEILING

Chapter Eight: Stalin Would Be Proud

Epilogue

TheDemocrat_Party_HatesAmerica