A truth-apt statement is one that can be evaluated as either true or false. For example, the statement “The Earth orbits the Sun” is truth-apt because it can be verified as true or false based on empirical evidence. In contrast, questions, commands, and some paradoxical sentences, such as “This sentence is false,” are not considered truth-apt because they do not aim to assert a proposition that can be evaluated for truth or falsehood[1][4].
Citations:
[1] https://philosophy.en-academic.com/2395/truth-apt
[2] https://ludwig.guru/s/truth-apt
[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/38dypa/does_logical_inference_only_apply_to_truthapt/
[4] https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803105953845
[5] https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/57583/are-prescriptions-truth-apt
[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLxCtLxW7Lg
[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgsXC0CDiwo
[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urwciBtlD9g