Skip to content
Read • Question • ConnectAnthony’s notes & researchReturn with a new question
Anthony’s NotesA personal field guide
From the notebook

retarded Islamic Center shooter manifesto

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Maybe there is a chance that we can take control and prevent our genocide. Maybe we can combat the hedonistic, nihilistic, and individualist insanity that has taken control western thought.

Replacement theory
Individualist — Sounds like the rhetoric from Christian Ethics / Andrew Wilson

Attachment (file not included in this release)

All of them can be traced back to be or be caused by one group, the jews. IT’S THE JEWS IT’S THE JEWS IT’S THE JEWS IT’S THE JEWS The Jews across all of time have been behind an EXTREMELY disproportionate amount of the world’s problems, whether that be from war, famine, exploitation of children, rise in degeneracy, infighting of peoples, political killings, the separation of family, the departure from the Church, the White race’s replacement, mass immigration, central banking systems, and so on, it has always been and always will be, the Jews. There is no moderate option to this problem, they’ll always rise back to power or do the same again wherever you exile them to, for any sane man seeing all this the only logical solution would be to just kill them all.

I wonder what the root of all these conspiracies come from

Attachment (file not included in this release)

So with all of that how was it that somehow, some way over the past several thousand years different peoples of different cultures and languages spread across countries or even entire continents somehow all developed antisemitism. Many many countries had to deal with the Jew and then having enough of them, forcibly expelling them or as they’ll tell you “persecuting” them forcing them to leave just to start again in some other poor unaware country that will be their next victim likely accepting them after hearing stories of these “poor innocent Jews escaping persecution” for NO reason at all.

Stealing the Jews money
Abusing a minority group

Attachment (file not included in this release)

So with all of that how was it that somehow, some way over the past several thousand years different peoples of different cultures and languages spread across countries or even entire continents somehow all developed antisemitism. Many many countries had to deal with the Jew and then having enough of them, forcibly expelling them or as they’ll tell you “persecuting” them forcing them to leave just to start again in some other poor unaware country that will be their next victim likely accepting them after hearing stories of these “poor innocent Jews escaping persecution” for NO reason at all.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Attachment (file not included in this release) Holocaust Denial

In fact quite the opposite, they were labor camps where surprisingly they were treated extremely well with accommodations and amenities that no prisoner would ever dream of, especially not one awaiting extermination.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Epstein Island is the most disgusting, vile, evil thing of our modern day and yet, it is nothing new. It is just Judaism in its purest form scaled up to an attraction of sorts to blackmail those who will not bend to their will willingly.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Jews unsurprisingly have an overly massive amount of representation when it comes to control and influence of the media.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

In chess the pieces on either side both hate each other. Meanwhile the people playing moving said pieces are usually good friends, this metaphor is indicative of the modern state of politics being nothing more but left wing Jews versus right wing Jews who laugh together at the goyim behind closed curtains.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

There’s several ways Jews spread degeneracy but the specific ones I’d like to touch on due to them being the most prevalent are race mixing, the porn industry, and LGBT/transgenderism

Attachment (file not included in this release)

After the Jew the most evil creature in this world is the woman.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

For a girl in my exact shoes they would be treated like that of a god, being praised and worshipped while I, a guy in these exact circumstances, am ridiculed and talked down to. When a girl is short it’s endearing, while I as a short guy am treated like a subhuman. When a girl is shy or introverted its cute, but I as a guy for being the exact same am seen as weird and awkward. When a girl is autistic it is seen as quirky, but I being an autist as a guy am treated like a retard. The foids always speak of an inequality between men and women and you know what, they are right. Other than the top ten percent of men(because that’s the only ones foids will ever acknowledge or see as human), guys get treated like absolute shit in comparison to women. This much is clearly unfair and the acts that foids have been able to get away with from simply existing as a woman is unforgivable, and so truly a righteous retribution is needed.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Genetic determinism is the most cruel, unfair, brutal reality to accept and women don’t make it any easier. As Saint Hamudi said “I was born and my life was over” and this is unfortunately the truth for many.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

I also recognize that while no race is equal to ours among the closest that comes to it is the Middle Easterns, they know how to wage war, they know how to build civilization, they know how to govern, and for this they can get my respect, at least enough to not want to bomb the ever living shit out of their countries, a sentiment that my own government does not share due to working on behalf of a foreign nation state.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

On average blacks have significantly lower IQs than whites. At one point the IQ level to be considered mentally retarded was set at 85 and below but then had to be lowered to 75 due to the fact this would render over 50% of the black population as retarded.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Blacks have far more protruding jaw bones and sloped foreheads compared to their white counterparts which then leaves less space inside their skull for the brain. Which part is left with less space you ask? The frontal cortex. This is extremely important because that part of the brain is responsible for high-level executive functions, including planning, decision-making, reasoning, and impulse control. This regulates emotions, personality, voluntary movement, and speech production. Explains a lot doesn’t it?

Attachment (file not included in this release)

rape at 30-35% being 2.5-3x more than whites which means niggers commit 1 in 3 rapes, along with the disgusting fact that in 2008 the interracial rape violence with a white victim and a black attacker was 19,293, while the black victims with a white attacker was zero, you’ll never be angry enough.

Fact check

I could find one government source from 2008 onward that gives the exact kind of table you’re asking for: BJS NCVS Table 42 for 2008, which breaks down rape/sexual assault by victim race and perceived offender race for single-offender victimizations. I did not find a later public BJS table that repeats this same sexual-violence-only cross-tab.

Source: https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/cv0842.pdf

Government-published interracial rape/sexual assault estimates, 2008+

Dataset: Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey
Table: Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2008 — Table 42
Category: “Rape/sexual assault”
Scope: Single-offender victimizations only
Offender race: Victim’s perceived race of offender
Important definition: BJS says this category includes verbal threats of rape and threats of sexual assault, not only completed rape.

YearVictim racePerceived offender raceTotal single-offender rape/sexual-assault victimizations for victim groupPercent attributed to offender raceEstimated victimizationsReliability note
2008White onlyBlack117,64016.4%19,293Percent marked *, based on 10 or fewer sample cases
2008White onlyOther117,6402.8%3,294Percent marked *, based on 10 or fewer sample cases
2008Black onlyWhite46,5800.0%0Total and percent marked *; unstable estimate
2008Black onlyOther46,5800.0%0Total and percent marked *; unstable estimate

Black-white interracial comparison only

YearDirectionEstimate
2008White victim / Black offender19,293
2008Black victim / White offender0

How the numbers were calculated

BJS gives the total and percentages, not always the calculated count. So the counts above are:

CalculationResult
117,640 × 16.4%19,293
117,640 × 2.8%3,294
46,580 × 0.0%0
46,580 × 0.0%0

Critical caveats

The 2008 table does show 0.0% for Black-only victims with perceived White offenders, but the row is marked with reliability warnings. BJS says an asterisk means the estimate is based on 10 or fewer sample cases, so this should not be interpreted as proof that literally no such incidents occurred nationally. It means the NCVS sample produced a rounded estimate of 0.0% in that cell.  

I found later BJS reports with victim race × offender race tables, but they are for all violent crime, not rape/sexual assault specifically. For example, BJS’s 2017–2021 race report covers violent incidents including rape/sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault, and simple assault, but does not isolate sexual violence in that cross-tab. Source: https://bjs.ojp.gov/violent-victimization-race-or-hispanic-origin-2008-2021  

Bottom line: for government-published, sexual-violence-only, interracial victim/offender race statistics from 2008 onward, the only direct table I found is the 2008 BJS NCVS Table 42. Later government data exists, but not in the same rape/sexual-assault-only interracial cross-tab format.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

I’ll bring up some points that prove this, for one it is shown that white kids from poor households tend to perform better in school than black kids from rich households. This is seen in the SAT score gaps between the two races from differing family income levels. Whites have a mean score of 978 on SATs with family incomes under $20,000 and blacks have a mean score of 981 on SATs while having a family income over $200,000 so clearly it isn’t that.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

I’ll bring up some points that prove this, for one it is shown that white kids from poor households tend to perform better in school than black kids from rich households. This is seen in the SAT score gaps between the two races from differing family income levels. Whites have a mean score of 978 on SATs with family incomes under $20,000 and blacks have a mean score of 981 on SATs while having a family income over $200,000 so clearly it isn’t that.

Fact check

The quoted SAT numbers are real or close to real, but the conclusion drawn from them is not justified.

Verdict

Partly true data point, misleading interpretation.

The claim uses a real pattern from older College Board SAT data: Black students from the highest reported family-income bracket scored around the same level as white students from the lowest reported family-income bracket. But the claim overstates what that proves. It does not prove that socioeconomic conditions are irrelevant, nor does it prove a genetic or innate racial explanation.

The numbers

The exact “978 vs. 981” comparison appears to come from commentary using older College Board SAT tables. The official 2008 College Board report gives the overall family-income means but not, in the public PDF table I found, the full race-by-income cross-tab. It does show that 2008 SAT data were for high-school graduates who took the SAT through March 2008, and that the most recent score was used if students tested more than once. (College Board 2008 Total Group Report)

For the total 2008 test-taking population, College Board reported:

Family incomeCritical ReadingMathWritingCombined
Under $20,0004344564301,320
More than $200,0005545705521,676

Source: College Board 2008 Total Group Report, Table 11

So, overall, SAT scores rose strongly with reported family income in 2008. The under-$20,000 group averaged 1,320, while the over-$200,000 group averaged 1,676, a gap of 356 points. The College Board table also reports that demographic information is intended to provide broader context for interpreting group scores, not to establish causal claims. (College Board 2008 Total Group Report)

The likely source of “978 vs. 981”

The specific claim that:

GroupClaimed SAT mean
White students, family income under $20,000978
Black students, family income over $200,000981

appears in a 2015 article from the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, which says the data are from 2008.
Source: The Growing Racial Gap in SAT Scores

That source says:

“The mean score for black students with family incomes above $200K was 981. The mean score for white students with family incomes below $20K was 978.”

So the quoted numbers appear to be traceable to a secondary source summarizing College Board race-by-income data. I found the official 2008 College Board total report, but not an official public 2008 College Board PDF table in the search results that directly displays those two exact race-by-income cells.

Why the conclusion is misleading

The quote says:

“so clearly it isn’t that.”

Meaning: because high-income Black students scored roughly the same as very-low-income white students, income cannot explain the racial SAT gap.

That inference is too crude.

1. “Family income” is not the same as socioeconomic background

A student’s reported family income at one moment does not capture:

  • parental wealth and assets
  • neighborhood conditions
  • school quality
  • parental education
  • family stability
  • exposure to violence or disorder
  • inherited educational advantages
  • accumulated tutoring/test-prep opportunities
  • peer environment
  • earlier childhood development
  • discrimination or stereotype threat
  • immigrant-selection effects
  • regional differences
  • whether parents recently became high-income or have had multi-generational wealth

Income is one variable. It is not a full control for social class or environment.

2. SAT-takers are a selected population

SAT data are not a random sample of all American teenagers. They are students who took the SAT, usually because they were considering college. That matters because different groups may enter the SAT-taking pool at different rates and under different selection pressures. A poorer white SAT-taker may be a more academically selected subset of poor white students, while a higher-income Black SAT-taker may represent a different selection profile.

3. Income has a strong overall relationship with SAT scores

The same 2008 College Board data show a large overall income gradient: 1,320 for the under-$20,000 group versus 1,676 for the over-$200,000 group. So it is false to say income “clearly” does not matter. It clearly does matter in the aggregate. (College Board 2008 Total Group Report)

4. Research finds income matters, but does not explain the entire Black-white SAT gap

A 2013 study by Dixon-Román, Everson, and McArdle analyzed College Board data and found that family income had a meaningful association with SAT performance, but the relationship was nonlinear and differed by race. The study’s exploratory analysis found family income had a “meaningful direct association” with SAT scores and that the association was especially strong for Black test-takers in some ranges. (Dixon-Román, Everson, and McArdle 2013)

That is a much better conclusion: income matters, but income alone does not explain all group differences.

5. This data does not establish innate racial ability differences

Even if the 978/981 comparison is accurate, it does not tell us why the gap exists. It does not isolate genetics, school quality, wealth, neighborhood, parental education, accumulated disadvantage, test-prep access, selection into SAT-taking, or any other causal mechanism.

Using one cross-tab to imply innate racial hierarchy is not statistically valid.

Corrected version

A more accurate version would be:

Older College Board SAT data reportedly showed that white SAT-takers from families earning under $20,000 had an average score similar to Black SAT-takers from families earning over $200,000. However, this does not prove that income or environment is irrelevant. SAT-takers are a selected population, income is only one measure of socioeconomic status, and the broader College Board data show a strong positive relationship between family income and SAT scores. The data show that income alone does not eliminate the racial SAT gap, not that socioeconomic conditions are irrelevant or that the gap is innate.

Bottom line: the quoted numbers appear to come from real 2008 SAT reporting, but the conclusion “clearly it isn’t income/environment” is false. The data support a narrower claim: family income alone does not fully account for the Black-white SAT gap among SAT-takers.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

n 1985 in Kansas City, Missouri a federal plan was enacted to boost the performance of disadvantaged black

Fact check

The claim is mostly true as a shorthand, but it is too compressed and ideologically loaded. The Kansas City case was real; the spending increase was real; the academic results were widely judged disappointing. But the exact framing needs correction.

Verdict

Mostly true, with important qualifications.

A more accurate version would be:

Beginning in the mid-1980s, the Kansas City, Missouri School District was placed under an extraordinary federal court-ordered desegregation remedy. The plan dramatically increased spending, including major capital improvements, magnet programs, salary increases, and “quality education” programs. By the early 1990s, spending reportedly reached about $11,700 per pupil. However, the plan did not produce the hoped-for improvements in test scores or reduce the Black-white achievement gap, and it did not achieve the intended level of desegregation.

What actually happened?

The case was Missouri v. Jenkins, a long-running school desegregation case involving the Kansas City, Missouri School District. A federal district court ordered extensive remedies intended to improve educational quality and make the district more attractive for desegregation purposes. The Supreme Court later described the program as including salary increases and remedial “quality education” programs, with the goal of improving educational opportunities and reducing racial isolation.
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1823.ZO.html

The district’s spending rose dramatically. The frequently cited $11,700 per pupil figure comes from Paul Ciotti’s 1998 Cato Institute report, which says Kansas City spent “as much as $11,700 per pupil,” more than any of the 280 largest districts after cost-of-living adjustment.
Source: https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/money-school-performance-lessons-kansas-city-desegregation-experiment

Fact-check table

ClaimCheckAssessment
“In 1985 Kansas City had a federal plan”The remedy began in the mid-1980s after long-running desegregation litigation. The district court’s major remedial orders were connected to the Kansas City desegregation case.Basically true
“To boost performance of disadvantaged Black kids”Improving educational opportunity for Black students was part of the purpose, but the legal remedy was broader: desegregation, reducing racial isolation, magnet-school attractiveness, and “quality education.”Partly true, oversimplified
“$11,700 per pupil”This figure is widely cited from the Cato/Hoover analysis for peak spending around 1991–92.True as a cited estimate
“Test scores didn’t improve”Critics report that test scores did not rise and the Black-white gap did not narrow. The Supreme Court record also refers to achievement levels still being “at or below national norms at many grade levels.”Broadly true, but depends on measure and time period
“Therefore money does not help education”This conclusion does not follow from one case. The Kansas City case is evidence against a specific court-ordered spending/desegregation strategy, not proof that funding never matters.Unsupported overgeneralization

What the Supreme Court said

In Missouri v. Jenkins in 1995, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the federal district court had gone too far in ordering salary increases and requiring continued funding of remedial quality-education programs. The Court noted that student achievement levels were still “at or below national norms at many grade levels,” and that the lower court had relied partly on the failure of test scores to rise sufficiently when deciding whether the state had achieved partial unitary status.
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1823.ZO.html

That supports the narrower claim that the expensive remedy had not achieved the desired academic results by the time of the litigation.

What the Cato/Hoover report claimed

Paul Ciotti’s report says the district spent heavily on teacher salaries, new schools, magnet programs, and expensive facilities, but that:

  • test scores did not rise,
  • the Black-white achievement gap did not narrow,
  • and racial integration did not improve as intended.

Source: https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/money-school-performance-lessons-kansas-city-desegregation-experiment

That is likely the direct source for the claim you are checking.

The main caveat

The Kansas City case is often used as a slogan: “They threw money at Black students and nothing worked.”

That is too simplistic.

A better interpretation is:

Kansas City shows that large spending increases alone, especially when routed through a court-designed desegregation/magnet-school strategy, do not automatically produce academic gains.

It does not prove:

  • that school funding never matters,
  • that disadvantaged students cannot improve,
  • that Black students are innately lower-performing,
  • or that all educational interventions are futile.

Bottom line

The claim is substantially based on a real case. Kansas City did undergo a massive federally supervised desegregation and school-improvement plan beginning in the mid-1980s, spending reportedly reached about $11,700 per pupil, and the academic outcomes were disappointing.

But the precise conclusion should be limited:

The Kansas City desegregation experiment is evidence that a very expensive, court-ordered school-improvement/desegregation plan failed to produce clear test-score gains. It is not proof that money, schooling, or environment are irrelevant to academic achievement.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

I’d call myself a Third Positionist specifically aligning most with Nationalist Socialism and Eco Fascism though any Third Positionism especially those that prioritize its people, nationalism, racial homogeneity, nature, traditionalist ideals, etc. is one I agree with and would follow. What was I religiously? Doesn’t matter, really at the end of the day as a friend once said, my religion is the white race.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

I am also an Accelerationist, I believe that accelerating towards the destruction of our current political system and towards an all-out race war for the purpose of a societal collapse is the only real way forward, I don’t believe there is a diplomatic solution to the problem we currently find ourselves in, as they would never allow it. While I do somewhat like movements like Patriot Front, America First, and various Nationalist Socialist political movements, I don’t believe a diplomatic approach of protesting, voting and infiltration could ever do anything to topple or even fix the current system of government. What we need is total dropout revolution.

Atomwaffen Division
Terrorgram
The Base (neo-Nazi group)

Attachment (file not included in this release)

There is no problem that violence cannot solve, one must just know how and where to direct it for favorable results and reactions.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Edits, memes, and propaganda based shitposting of all kinds, this has done more to radicalize the masses than any book or manifesto ever could. So to be successful make sure to provide the means to create all this propaganda. Livestream your day of action, make videos that will rile people up, God knows the AWD propaganda videos did that for me, leave behind writings to the best of your ability, become as memeable and iconic as possible, and of course, raise hell at the enemy. This is how we win.

Ford, Henry - The International Jew - The Worlds Foremost Problem (2003) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

soyjak.party
Welcome to 8kun
Endchan

Payton Gendron
Pittsburgh synagogue shooting

Attachment (file not included in this release)

I also agree with his motives, the US should never have been in the middle east killing random civilians and for that they deserved Pulse. Mateen is an absolute hero and the type of muzzie I could get along with. For the rest of you islamists back home keep up the good work of throwing those homos off of roofs lol.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

I believe conservatism is the ideology of a coward because at least the left pushes for their beliefs, even if those beliefs are idiotic in nature.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Remember, anyone who claims to be a “Judeo-Christian” is either a kike or some retarded goyslave who doesnt understand that jewish values are anti-christian, and any kike that claims to be a Christian is a lying faggot. Real Christians are the soldiers who stood up to fight the kikes, such as Saint John Earnest.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

The average man used to have a purpose, they didn’t have to worry about what another family was doing because they had to focus on their own family. The industrial revolution has severed family ties and destroyed all purpose, leaving the modern man with nothing but emptiness.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Every man requires a goal that demands effort and the ability to attain that goal, and modern society gives him none of that.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

Every man needs some sort of relationship to feel happy, even when the rest of their life is good and has no problems. If a man is deprived of the physical and mental touch of a woman’s love, then they will feel unhappy. When man puts effort into finding a relationship but comes out with zero results, and this goes on for their entire life, then that man will fall into a depressive state. Because being deprived of love is something that will slowly kill anyone, man or woman. But women don’t have that problem because every woman can find at least a handful of men that will love them, while not every man will find a woman that loves them.

unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf

Attachment (file not included in this release)

The only good religion is Christianity. The worst and most deplorable religions are judaism and satanism, which are the same thing.

Attachment (file not included in this release)

am a Christian Ecofascist Accelerationist. I believe that the only way to the liberation of the white race is through violence, sabotage, and revolution. I believe we need the white masses to realize we are not at fault for the failures of the other races. I believe we need to accelerate the collapse of modern society so that we can rebuild it into something better.