📓 In your handwritten notebooks
- March 21 – June 9 2026, pp. 30 — People’s reactions · Socratic questioning → open PDF p38 (file not included in this release)
Index: Personal Journal
Questioning as the whole strategy: you don’t assert the conclusion, you ask until they reach it — or until the position visibly can’t hold its own weight. Costs you nothing to be wrong, and the audience watches them do the work.
The six types (Paul’s taxonomy)
| Type | Ask |
|---|---|
| Clarification | What do you mean by that? Can you give an example? |
| Probing assumptions | What are you taking for granted? What if the opposite were true? |
| Probing reasons & evidence | What’s that based on? How do you know? Is that the best evidence available? |
| Viewpoints & perspectives | What would someone who disagrees say? What’s the strongest counter? |
| Implications & consequences | If that’s true, what follows? Are you willing to accept that? |
| Questions about the question | Why does this question matter? Is it the right question to be asking? |
Koukl’s “Columbo”
Three questions, in order: What do you mean by that? · How did you come to that conclusion? · Have you considered…? The first two are almost never wasted. See Tactics - Gregory Koukl.
Related → Critical Thinking · Internal Critique · Attacking An Argument > Questioning · Debate University Course > What Makes a Good Question
📄 Source Pages
Handwritten journal source
Consolidated source: PDF pp. 37–38 (file not included in this release)
Source boundary: These are handwritten source pages. Use the scan for exact wording; verify quotations and factual claims before reuse.
Embedded preview:
March 21-June 9 2026.pdf (file not included in this release)
Open the journal routing table